Harris
Dickinson's stricken face at the end of Beach
Rats
In the final shots of Eliza Hittman's sensitive
independent film Beach Rats (2017),
the rootless teen Frankie (Harris Dickinson) stares at the fireworks over Coney
Island. Earlier in the film, he and his friends had looked on them with
disdain. They found no great thrill in the display, even if he uses it as a
conversation starter with Simone (Madeline Weinstein), a pretty girl he sees on
the pier. But now, his life a mess, he watches them through pained eyes. Is the
weekly display all he has left to look forward to? It's a gripping image, made
more powerful by the way it echoes the ending of Francois Truffaut's first
feature, The 400 Blows (1959), the
famous freeze-frame on Jean-Pierre Leaud's face as his Antoine Doinel looks at
the ocean for the first time and realizes it's not really the escape from his
tortured life for which he had hoped. To say Truffaut's film is the screen's greatest
portrait of youth at risk is hardly to denigrate Ms. Hittman's work, but rather
to put it in perspective among the screen's more powerful portraits of the way
young people can feel trapped in a world that seems to offer no real future.
Truffaut drew on details from his own childhood
to paint Doinel as a victim of his parents' almost malicious neglect. Hittman's
Frankie suffers from neglect, too, but it's more a matter of circumstance.
Frankie's father is dying of cancer, and his well-meaning mother (Kate Hodge,
in a deeply felt performance) is understandably preoccupied with caring for him
and keeping the bills paid. Without guidance, he just hangs out with his
friends, shooting hoops, getting high and trying to pick up girls. They support
themselves with petty crime. While waiting to get on the bumper cars at Coney
Island, one of them lifts a wallet from the person ahead of them. Frankie
steals his father's painkillers to share with his friends and sell for a quick
buck. At one point, he even pawns his mother's jewelry.
There's another difference between Frankie and
Antoine. Frankie is gay. In the first scene, he cruises an on-line hook-up
service looking for a man to talk to. Eventually he starts meeting the men from
the site. Not that he's out to himself. In his view, he's just what's called an
"MSM," a man who has sex with men. For the most part he dates older
men for fear of hooking up with someone who might know his friends. When he
meets one of his tricks in public, he almost panics. The man is one of the
bartenders on a party boat Frankie's gone to with his friends and Simone, and
when the guy tries to send the group free drinks, claiming the girlfriend is
too pretty to have to pay, Frankie is furious. Later, when his friends catch
him on his way to another date, Frankie tells them he only hooks up with gay
men because they have drugs, lying that he gets high with them and then leaves
them cold.
There's a price to pay for this dishonesty. In
two of the three gay encounters shown in the film, the men simply treat Frankie
as a receptacle. It's interesting that the only one who actually spends time
with him and seems to care about his enjoying the encounter is the guy who
tries to comp him for drinks later. And Frankie is finding the façade of
heterosexuality harder to pull off. It's not just that his friends catch him.
When he hooks up with Simone, he can only perform once, and only then by
running to the bathroom to psych himself up in private. Hittman doesn't go for
the obvious by having him pull out some gay porn to get in the mood, but you're
pretty sure it's not Simone he's thinking about.
Hittman handles all of this with an objective sense
of restraint. She's not there to judge the character; she just wants to show us
what his life is like. When Frankie's father dies, she doesn't milk the scene
for easy sentiment. She just shows the family gathered around his hospital bed
in the living room. The slowing of the heart monitor is the only clue that this
is the end for him. At times she may be a little too restrained. You may find
yourself longing for a big, fiery confrontation out of '50s kitchen-sink
realism. And there's no big climax at the end. After Frankie lets his friends
beat up a trick, the first younger man he's tried to meet, he simply runs off
to Coney Island to watch the fireworks. Yet that final image of him is
haunting. It stayed with me long after some forced crisis might have.
Hittman's helped greatly by Dickenson's
performance. He has a gift for getting inside his character and letting us see
the world through his eyes (his performance as the telekinetic teen in this
year's The Darkest Minds was one of
the few saving graces of that mediocre effort to launch a sci-fi/fantasy
franchise). Even when you can see Frankie making stupid choices, you know why
he's doing it, and Dickenson draws you in enough to be on his side.
With its seaside setting and depiction of vagrant
youth, Beach Rats calls up another
association — with Federico Fellini's second feature, I Vitelloni. Like The 400
Blows, the Fellini film is semi-autobiographical, with the director
represented by Moraldo (Franco Interlenghi), the group's philosopher who
eventually runs off to Rome to build a new life. The two comparisons make the
ending of Beach Rats even more
painful. We know that Truffaut and Fellini eventually moved beyond their
adolescent problems to become major filmmakers. But what does poor Frankie
have? Doinel had the movies and his love of Balzac; Moraldo, his questioning. There's
no indication in Beach Rats that
Frankie has any special talent. He can charm girls for a while, and he can
steal drugs (if it doesn't require too much planning). Under the credits, he
takes pictures of himself from the neck down, the kinds of shots people post to
sell their bodies while keeping their faces hidden. At that moment, Hittman
turns the gaze on her male star and, as the male gaze in cinema most often does
to women, reduces him to disjointed body parts. By the end, that seems to be
all he has to offer, and he doesn't seem to have the intelligence or maturity
to survive that for long.
The two reasons
to see King Cobra: Garrett Clayton
and Christian Slater
If anyone had the brains and maturity to survive
a life in the sex trade, it's the version of Brent Corrigan (the stage name for
Sean Lockhart) played by Garrett Clayton in Justin Kelly's King Cobra (2016). As written by Kelly and D. Madison Savage and
played by Clayton, Corrigan is almost the Eve Harrington of gay porn. In his
initial interview for porn director Stephen (the film's name for Bryan Kocis,
who actually discovered him), he comes off as a young naïf. But the camera is
on, and before long he's taking his clothes off in a scenario that's far from
unfamiliar to anybody who's seen more than a few solo films. After he agrees to
work for Stephen, there's a brief shot of him in his room as he tries out
different ways of wearing a baseball cap. That's where you see the wheels start
clicking. It's a wonderful actor's moment, as Clayton takes us inside the
character to show him rehearsing the image he'll use to sell videos over the
next several years.
The humor from that scene carries into the way
Kelly depicts Corrigan's early films for Cobra. He mainly focuses on the set-up
scenes and seems to enjoy the cheesy dialogue and cheerful non-acting. As a
result, the films made for Cobra come off as silly and queasy and little bit
erotic all at the same time.
Clayton's portrait of the young macher is matched
by Christian Slater's performance as Stephen. There's an openness to his work
here I've never seen before; even in the recent TV series Mr. Robot, he seems more focused on projecting an attitude than
getting inside his character's head. But he seems totally in synch with the
porn producer he plays in King Cobra.
Stephen is just as much of a schemer as Corrigan, but he's also a Pygmalion who's
fallen hard for his Galatea. You can see the pain in his eyes when Corrigan
starts fighting for his independence, even as you know that he's been ripping
him off for years, underpaying him for videos that are pulling in six figures
each. By the time he reaches his sorry end, dragged through the legal system
when Corrigan reveals he was underage when he made his first videos and
eventually murdered by a rival producer, you can't help but feel sorry for him.
The film is based on the real-life story of
Corrigan's relationship with Kocis and their legal battles when Corrigan tried
to break free of his control to forge his own career. It's there the film
starts to fall apart. Kelly goes to great pains to depict Corrigan as Kocis' victim
while also trying to keep the director sympathetic. When Kocis reveals he's
copyrighted the Brent Corrigan name, Lockhart finds he can't work anywhere.
Nobody wants him as anything other than Brent Corrigan. That's not true,
however. In reality, Corrigan made three films as Fox Ryder before reaching a
settlement to use the Corrigan name. In addition, the scenes of his abjection
are a drain on the film, and though Clayton plays the wronged innocent well, it
doesn't really work with the way he's been depicted as a schemer. It's as if
Kelly wants us to laugh at the character's machinations and then suddenly feel
sorry for him.
The film's biggest problem, however, is in
presenting Kocis' killers, a pair of hustlers turned porn producers played by
Keegan Allen and James Franco. Allen is perfectly fine as the young stud who's
fallen for a life of privilege with his lover/pimp/producer, but Franco has a
rare misfire as the more volatile half of the relationship. The character is a
master of self-deception. He lives beyond his means and thinks the tacky porn
films he makes with his lover are his ticket to the big time. Franco seems to
be too smart for all that. When he has to get violent, he can't get a
convincing rhythm going, and his scenes threatening and browbeating his partner
fall flat.
There are also moments of almost self-conscious
artiness. Stephen has a taste for classical music, which is established early
on. For most of the film, the classics are confined to his scenes. When the
police come to arrest Franco and Allen, however, the soundtrack switches to
Schubert's "Ave Maria." Only it's not just the "Ave Maria."
It's a mash-up with "Love Me Forever," a song setting lyrics by Tim
Kvasnosky to the Schubert music, and the original Latin text. "Love me
forever and pray for us sinners?" It's a strange muddle, but by then, so
is the film.
The real star
of The Gay Deceivers, Michael Greer (r.),
and the man who should have been one of its stars, Christopher Riordan (below)
Imagine a romantic comedy set in an apartment
complex for gay men. The piece is shot in the pop, crayon-box colors of the
late 1960s. The leading man is the landlord, a flamboyant gay man in a happy,
long-term relationship who acts as den mother to the tenants. He decorates
their apartments, gives them romantic advice, provides a sympathetic ear and
even cooks for them if they need help in the kitchen. The complex's resident
hottie is always on the prowl, even as he's caught in a frustrating romance
with an Army recruiter who has to keep the relationship a secret. When a pair
of straight boys move in, pretending to be gay to avoid the draft, everybody
sees through them but plays along just to twit the dimwitted dolts and even
tease them into a few compromising situations. Most of us would lap something
like that up.
Unfortunately, that's not The Gay Deceivers, a 1969 sex comedy that makes the mistake of
focusing more on the straight boys than on their gay neighbors. Of course,
that's the nature of the period. Homosexuality had only been allowed as a
screen subject since 1961 (when William Wyler finally got the Production Code
Administration to approve his rather overwrought adaptation of The Children's Hour), and was treated
mainly as a subplot when it did turn up. Back then gay men and lesbians only
appeared as either perverted villains or tragic psychological mistakes. My images of gay representation in that era
are dominated by the failed primetime soap Executive
Suite, in which a woman confesses to her best friend that she's in love
with her (at the time, one "confessed" to homosexuality, because it
was still a crime in many states), then runs into the street only to be hit and
killed by a garbage truck. The fact that the tortured lesbian was the
incandescent Geraldine Brooks and the object of her affection Patricia Smith, a
good character actress but hardly the type to whom one would write sonnets,
just made it even more ridiculous. At least there are no garbage trucks in The Gay Deceivers.
What there is, however, is an illogical plot in
which a rich, white law student (Kevin Coughlin) whose family could easily have
bought him out of the draft gets his childhood buddy (Lawrence P. Casey), a lifeguard
and gigolo (the straight kind, so it's OK) to pose as his lover so they'll be classified
4F. When they think the recruiting officer (Jack Starrett) is spying on them,
they move into the gay complex while trying to keep Coughlin's family and
girlfriend from learning about the ruse. It should be the set-up for a
door-slamming farce, but their labored efforts to keep up the pose without
sacrificing their love lives aren't exactly funny.
What is funny, however, is the complex and its
residents. Michael Greer was already out and proud when he made his film debut
as their landlord, Malcolm. Director Bruce Kessler, who apparently was
committed to making a good movie, gave Greer his head, resulting in a more
positive depiction of homosexuality than was originally in the script.
Unfortunately, that only applies to Malcolm's scenes. When he's not on-screen,
there are still some painful lines about gay people being child molesters, and
Coughlin's and, particularly, Casey's stereotyped attempts to pass as gay. Yet
there's also a powerful scene near the end, when Coughlin's father finds out
about the ruse and tells him about the real-world consequences of his behavior,
particularly should he become a lawyer. This all tends to give the film
something of a split personality as it mocks homosexuality in some scenes,
celebrates it in others and seriously acknowledges the consequences of anti-gay
bigotry.
None of that seems to matter when Greer is
on-screen, however. His relationship with his partner (Sebastian Brook) is the
most mature, positive pairing in the film (certainly better than Coughlin's
stock parents — stern father and ditzy mother — or his relationship with his
judgmental girlfriend, a role that forces the talented Brooke Bundy to function
as resident turd in the punchbowl). One scene Greer added, in which he fixes
breakfast for the new tenants, is a comic delight. As the radio plays an
arrangement of the "Habanera" from Carmen, he dances around the kitchen, at one point even putting a
rose between his teeth. It's the kind of thing that would be insufferably
over-the-top in the hands of a less-accomplished actor, but Greer's movement is
so controlled and, at times, even graceful, he pulls it off. The script
requires not one, but both of the straight boys to look in at different times
and mug to the camera to register that they can't believe what he's doing. In
the theatre, that's what we call "milking the cat." Frankly, the
young men would be better advised to study his performance as a lesson in how
to play farce.
They'd also be well-advised to study Christopher
Riordan's work as Duane, the resident hottie. Riordan doesn't have a lot to do,
which is a pity. He's an experienced dancer who knows how to make every
movement count, and he's smart enough to know how people behave. When he first
shows up, he delivers the "cruise of death" to the two guys with
skill and precision. During the costume party scene, the camera keeps cutting
to him for good reason. Not only does he look terrific (he's done up in hippie
garb, and let's just say, his beads are very well supported), but he also drops
his pithy observations on what's going on with all the skill of a young Eve
Arden.
The Gay
Deceivers
did surprisingly well at the box office, which historian Richard Barrios
credits to Greer's performance. He should have had a great career, but after
playing Queenie in the overwrought film version of Fortune and Men's Eyes (1971), he was so typed in gay roles he
found it hard to get film work (he wasn't the only one typed; Coughlin, who
wasn't a bad actor, had trouble finding work after The Gay Deceivers). It's too bad the screen hadn't progressed
enough to star Greer in a series of films as the landlord, with Riordan more
prominently featured. Imagine how much fun that might have been.
Alexander Bracq
shot through shadows in Seeing Heaven,
an image as cloudy as the rest of the film
At the start of Ian Powell's Seeing Heaven (2010) we learn three
things about the romantic young hustler Paul (Alexander Bracq): he's the most
beautiful man porn director Baxter (Lee Chapman) has ever seen; he's trying to
find his long-lost twin brother, also an escort; and whenever he has sex, he
has visions of his brother, so he agrees to star in Baxter's newest film hoping
all that sex will lead him to the man. Therein lie most of the film's problems.
Calling somebody "the most" anything
in a visual medium, is generally not a good idea. There's a reason Alfred
Hitchcock never showed the audience the first Mrs. De Winter in Rebecca (1940). Nothing could live up to
her description. It's not that Bracq is unattractive. It's just hard to buy him
as the most beautiful man anybody has ever seen. Hell, Chapman is lots hotter.
Does the man never look in the mirror?
As for Paul's wanting to find his twin: Bracq,
most of whose credits are for stunt work rather than acting, is such a weak
actor it's hard to believe his wanting anything. Playing objectives seems to be
somewhere outside his wheelhouse.
The idea of having visions during sex might work
for a soft-core thriller. But Powell's script also has Paul experiencing
visions while he sleeps, when he looks at art and when he watches other people
have sex. So, why does he need to star in a porn film to find his brother. It
would seem a nice trip to a museum would do the trick.
I guess that would mean cutting the videos of
him shooting the porn film. They're not that hot, certainly not as much fun as
the porn scenes in King Cobra. Here,
it really is like finding gay Skinemax among your cable channels. Frequently
after a torrid love scene, the two guys get out of bed wearing underwear, which
isn't a physical impossibility, but I mean, why bother.
If the whole thing moved more quickly, the
ludicrous plotting might work on at least a camp level. You could laugh at it
and make wisecracks in between the lines. But this thing is so slow, you begin
to think you could play Mourning Becomes
Electra during the pauses.
It's also bristling with self-importance. It's
not just the moody scenes of people staring at each other or even the morose
Baxter chain-smoking through his own sexual encounters (and never at any other
time). Baxter's dream is to make one more porn film so he can finance the
serious script he's written, which would cast Paul as the most beautiful man in
the world. At the film's end, after a bunch of strained revelations, including another
producer's plot to drug Paul into doing bareback scenes, Baxter decides his
more serious film is just another way of objectifying the young man, so he
throws his script from the balcony of his apartment…one page at a time…in slow
motion. It already seems hypocritical for the film to want us to feel guilty
about watching the sex scenes. Since
they're really not all that hot, it ultimately seems like the height of
self-deception.
I just watched The Gay Deceivers, not knowing that you had written about the film. You hit the nail on its flat head -- the only characters worth paying attention to are the gay ones. There is a moment in the film where the straight boy and his girlfriend go to a gay bar, the set for which is done up quite respectfully and accurately, and the girlfriend remarks on one the customers "Look, that one is wearing an earring", and we see, behind her, the extra with the earring who looks right at her, laughs her off, and carries on. It is a moment of sublime indifference to the hetero gaze. The film is full of such tiny perfect moments, emboldening moments, and I loved it for that. But the script is a mess, the ending even worse.
ReplyDelete